Showing posts with label http. Show all posts
Showing posts with label http. Show all posts

Friday, February 24, 2012

Application Event log message

Its just a bug...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;230393
Peter

>--Original Message--
>Recently, I have been seeing the following event(s) in
the application event
>log on a number of my SQL servers. I have Googled this
and get the
>impression that it can just be ignored, but these are
becoming more
>frequent, and was wondering if anyone here could shed a
bit more light on
>the cause, and any possible way of preventing them. All
instances running
>SQL 2000 SP3 (or SP3a)
>Source: SQLSERVERAGENT
>Category: Alert Engine
>Event ID: 322
>Message: The data portion of event 19004 from MSSQLSERVER
is invalid.
>R - MCSE (2003, 2000, NT4), MCSA (2003, 2000), MCDBA
(SQL2000)
>
>.
>
Thanks for the response. I had already seen that KB article, but was
wondering if anyone had identified what causes this to start occurring. For
well over a year, I have not seen this message, then recently it started to
appear. I am leaning towards an upgrade by our ITS team of SMS 2000 to SMS
2003, and the application of the new SMS advanced client (not sure if SMS
uses SNMP to communicate with clients, and vice-versa). This seems to
roughly coincide with the start of these messages. In the meantime, I will
configure my monitoring software to stop alerting me of these messages.
Any thoughts?
R
"Peter the Spate" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:29be01c47df4$9064e4c0$a601280a@.phx.gbl...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Its just a bug...
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
> us;230393
> Peter
>
> the application event
> and get the
> becoming more
> bit more light on
> instances running
> is invalid.
> (SQL2000)
|||The only thing I can think of is to go through the check
list below
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...sms/sms2003/de
ploy/spgsms03/spsmsaph.mspx
Apologies for the lack of answers.
Peter

>--Original Message--
>Thanks for the response. I had already seen that KB
article, but was
>wondering if anyone had identified what causes this to
start occurring. For
>well over a year, I have not seen this message, then
recently it started to
>appear. I am leaning towards an upgrade by our ITS team
of SMS 2000 to SMS
>2003, and the application of the new SMS advanced client
(not sure if SMS
>uses SNMP to communicate with clients, and vice-versa).
This seems to
>roughly coincide with the start of these messages. In the
meantime, I will
>configure my monitoring software to stop alerting me of
these messages.
>Any thoughts?
>R
>"Peter the Spate" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote in message[vbcol=seagreen]
>news:29be01c47df4$9064e4c0$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
MSSQLSERVER
>
>.
>

Application Event log message

Its just a bug...
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;230393
Peter

>--Original Message--
>Recently, I have been seeing the following event(s) in
the application event
>log on a number of my SQL servers. I have Googled this
and get the
>impression that it can just be ignored, but these are
becoming more
>frequent, and was wondering if anyone here could shed a
bit more light on
>the cause, and any possible way of preventing them. All
instances running
>SQL 2000 SP3 (or SP3a)
>Source: SQLSERVERAGENT
>Category: Alert Engine
>Event ID: 322
>Message: The data portion of event 19004 from MSSQLSERVER
is invalid.
>R - MCSE (2003, 2000, NT4), MCSA (2003, 2000), MCDBA
(SQL2000)
>
>.
>Thanks for the response. I had already seen that KB article, but was
wondering if anyone had identified what causes this to start occurring. For
well over a year, I have not seen this message, then recently it started to
appear. I am leaning towards an upgrade by our ITS team of SMS 2000 to SMS
2003, and the application of the new SMS advanced client (not sure if SMS
uses SNMP to communicate with clients, and vice-versa). This seems to
roughly coincide with the start of these messages. In the meantime, I will
configure my monitoring software to stop alerting me of these messages.
Any thoughts?
R
"Peter the Spate" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:29be01c47df4$9064e4c0$a601280a@.phx.gbl...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Its just a bug...
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
> us;230393
> Peter
>
> the application event
> and get the
> becoming more
> bit more light on
> instances running
> is invalid.
> (SQL2000)|||The only thing I can think of is to go through the check
list below
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pr.../sms/sms2003/de
ploy/spgsms03/spsmsaph.mspx
Apologies for the lack of answers.
Peter

>--Original Message--
>Thanks for the response. I had already seen that KB
article, but was
>wondering if anyone had identified what causes this to
start occurring. For
>well over a year, I have not seen this message, then
recently it started to
>appear. I am leaning towards an upgrade by our ITS team
of SMS 2000 to SMS
>2003, and the application of the new SMS advanced client
(not sure if SMS
>uses SNMP to communicate with clients, and vice-versa).
This seems to
>roughly coincide with the start of these messages. In the
meantime, I will
>configure my monitoring software to stop alerting me of
these messages.
>Any thoughts?
>R
>"Peter the Spate" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote in message
>news:29be01c47df4$9064e4c0$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
MSSQLSERVER[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>.
>

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Anyone Use Live Vault?

Hi Everyone,
I'm investigating a software called Live Vault (http://www.livevault.com)
whose purpose is to continuously monitor and record changes in a SQL Server
database, at the database file level, and periodically send these changes to
a remote server where they're applied to matching files. In essence, it's
kind of up-to-the-minute backup of the database.
I am unsure about how this software is going to perform and/or affect the
database and I'm very interested in hearing from anyone who has experience
with this software.
Any information, thoughts and opinions regarding this tool is greatly
appreciated.
Lou
Hi
They do not state on their case studies exactly what OS's and Database
products are supported. Not a word about SQL Server on their site.
Ask the vendor if they have certified their product for SQL Server.
And don't forget, picking up the bits off disk, shipping them over a
connection, does induce performance limitations, and if your data were to go
corrupt on the local drive, the corruption is faithfully copied to them.
A service like this does not eliminate the need for regular Database and Log
dumps.
Regards
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Louis Marchand" <lmarch@.safetrans.com> wrote in message
news:eooNWKQTFHA.4056@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi Everyone,
> I'm investigating a software called Live Vault (http://www.livevault.com)
> whose purpose is to continuously monitor and record changes in a SQL
> Server
> database, at the database file level, and periodically send these changes
> to
> a remote server where they're applied to matching files. In essence, it's
> kind of up-to-the-minute backup of the database.
> I am unsure about how this software is going to perform and/or affect the
> database and I'm very interested in hearing from anyone who has experience
> with this software.
> Any information, thoughts and opinions regarding this tool is greatly
> appreciated.
> Lou
>
|||Mike,
Thank you very much for your input.
I do nightly full database backups and hourly transaction log backups during
business hours every day and copy these backups onto tape each night. This
leaves a potential one-day data loss in case of catastrophic failure.
Management sees Live Vault as a way to have an "up-to-the-minute" database
backup. Our systems group has had success using Live Vault to restore basic
user files e.g. Word documents or PDF documents, that sort of thing.
However, I am very suspicious of a product that monitors live SQL Server
data files. It sounds wonderful in theory but I've always been very leary
of the kind of bit level monitoring that's required.
I am really hoping someone on the newsgroup is using or has used the product
and could give a first hand account of their experiences. If there's anyone
out there reading this, I'd love to hear your honest assessment of the
product, any problems you've had and the support you received from Live
Vault addressing problems.
Best regards,
Lou
Louis Marchand
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
news:etHYsWZTFHA.1384@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> They do not state on their case studies exactly what OS's and Database
> products are supported. Not a word about SQL Server on their site.
> Ask the vendor if they have certified their product for SQL Server.
> And don't forget, picking up the bits off disk, shipping them over a
> connection, does induce performance limitations, and if your data were to
go
> corrupt on the local drive, the corruption is faithfully copied to them.
> A service like this does not eliminate the need for regular Database and
Log[vbcol=seagreen]
> dumps.
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "Louis Marchand" <lmarch@.safetrans.com> wrote in message
> news:eooNWKQTFHA.4056@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
(http://www.livevault.com)[vbcol=seagreen]
changes[vbcol=seagreen]
it's[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
experience
>

Anyone Use Live Vault?

Hi Everyone,
I'm investigating a software called Live Vault (http://www.livevault.com)
whose purpose is to continuously monitor and record changes in a SQL Server
database, at the database file level, and periodically send these changes to
a remote server where they're applied to matching files. In essence, it's
kind of up-to-the-minute backup of the database.
I am unsure about how this software is going to perform and/or affect the
database and I'm very interested in hearing from anyone who has experience
with this software.
Any information, thoughts and opinions regarding this tool is greatly
appreciated.
LouHi
They do not state on their case studies exactly what OS's and Database
products are supported. Not a word about SQL Server on their site.
Ask the vendor if they have certified their product for SQL Server.
And don't forget, picking up the bits off disk, shipping them over a
connection, does induce performance limitations, and if your data were to go
corrupt on the local drive, the corruption is faithfully copied to them.
A service like this does not eliminate the need for regular Database and Log
dumps.
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Louis Marchand" <lmarch@.safetrans.com> wrote in message
news:eooNWKQTFHA.4056@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi Everyone,
> I'm investigating a software called Live Vault (http://www.livevault.com)
> whose purpose is to continuously monitor and record changes in a SQL
> Server
> database, at the database file level, and periodically send these changes
> to
> a remote server where they're applied to matching files. In essence, it's
> kind of up-to-the-minute backup of the database.
> I am unsure about how this software is going to perform and/or affect the
> database and I'm very interested in hearing from anyone who has experience
> with this software.
> Any information, thoughts and opinions regarding this tool is greatly
> appreciated.
> Lou
>|||Mike,
Thank you very much for your input.
I do nightly full database backups and hourly transaction log backups during
business hours every day and copy these backups onto tape each night. This
leaves a potential one-day data loss in case of catastrophic failure.
Management sees Live Vault as a way to have an "up-to-the-minute" database
backup. Our systems group has had success using Live Vault to restore basic
user files e.g. Word documents or PDF documents, that sort of thing.
However, I am very suspicious of a product that monitors live SQL Server
data files. It sounds wonderful in theory but I've always been very leary
of the kind of bit level monitoring that's required.
I am really hoping someone on the newsgroup is using or has used the product
and could give a first hand account of their experiences. If there's anyone
out there reading this, I'd love to hear your honest assessment of the
product, any problems you've had and the support you received from Live
Vault addressing problems.
Best regards,
Lou
Louis Marchand
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
news:etHYsWZTFHA.1384@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> They do not state on their case studies exactly what OS's and Database
> products are supported. Not a word about SQL Server on their site.
> Ask the vendor if they have certified their product for SQL Server.
> And don't forget, picking up the bits off disk, shipping them over a
> connection, does induce performance limitations, and if your data were to
go
> corrupt on the local drive, the corruption is faithfully copied to them.
> A service like this does not eliminate the need for regular Database and
Log
> dumps.
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "Louis Marchand" <lmarch@.safetrans.com> wrote in message
> news:eooNWKQTFHA.4056@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > Hi Everyone,
> > I'm investigating a software called Live Vault
(http://www.livevault.com)
> > whose purpose is to continuously monitor and record changes in a SQL
> > Server
> > database, at the database file level, and periodically send these
changes
> > to
> > a remote server where they're applied to matching files. In essence,
it's
> > kind of up-to-the-minute backup of the database.
> >
> > I am unsure about how this software is going to perform and/or affect
the
> > database and I'm very interested in hearing from anyone who has
experience
> > with this software.
> >
> > Any information, thoughts and opinions regarding this tool is greatly
> > appreciated.
> > Lou
> >
> >
>

Anyone Use Live Vault?

Hi Everyone,
I'm investigating a software called Live Vault (http://www.livevault.com)
whose purpose is to continuously monitor and record changes in a SQL Server
database, at the database file level, and periodically send these changes to
a remote server where they're applied to matching files. In essence, it's
kind of up-to-the-minute backup of the database.
I am unsure about how this software is going to perform and/or affect the
database and I'm very interested in hearing from anyone who has experience
with this software.
Any information, thoughts and opinions regarding this tool is greatly
appreciated.
LouHi
They do not state on their case studies exactly what OS's and Database
products are supported. Not a word about SQL Server on their site.
Ask the vendor if they have certified their product for SQL Server.
And don't forget, picking up the bits off disk, shipping them over a
connection, does induce performance limitations, and if your data were to go
corrupt on the local drive, the corruption is faithfully copied to them.
A service like this does not eliminate the need for regular Database and Log
dumps.
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Louis Marchand" <lmarch@.safetrans.com> wrote in message
news:eooNWKQTFHA.4056@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi Everyone,
> I'm investigating a software called Live Vault (http://www.livevault.com)
> whose purpose is to continuously monitor and record changes in a SQL
> Server
> database, at the database file level, and periodically send these changes
> to
> a remote server where they're applied to matching files. In essence, it's
> kind of up-to-the-minute backup of the database.
> I am unsure about how this software is going to perform and/or affect the
> database and I'm very interested in hearing from anyone who has experience
> with this software.
> Any information, thoughts and opinions regarding this tool is greatly
> appreciated.
> Lou
>|||Mike,
Thank you very much for your input.
I do nightly full database backups and hourly transaction log backups during
business hours every day and copy these backups onto tape each night. This
leaves a potential one-day data loss in case of catastrophic failure.
Management sees Live Vault as a way to have an "up-to-the-minute" database
backup. Our systems group has had success using Live Vault to restore basic
user files e.g. Word documents or PDF documents, that sort of thing.
However, I am very suspicious of a product that monitors live SQL Server
data files. It sounds wonderful in theory but I've always been very leary
of the kind of bit level monitoring that's required.
I am really hoping someone on the newsgroup is using or has used the product
and could give a first hand account of their experiences. If there's anyone
out there reading this, I'd love to hear your honest assessment of the
product, any problems you've had and the support you received from Live
Vault addressing problems.
Best regards,
Lou
Louis Marchand
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" <mike@.epprecht.net> wrote in message
news:etHYsWZTFHA.1384@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> They do not state on their case studies exactly what OS's and Database
> products are supported. Not a word about SQL Server on their site.
> Ask the vendor if they have certified their product for SQL Server.
> And don't forget, picking up the bits off disk, shipping them over a
> connection, does induce performance limitations, and if your data were to
go
> corrupt on the local drive, the corruption is faithfully copied to them.
> A service like this does not eliminate the need for regular Database and
Log
> dumps.
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "Louis Marchand" <lmarch@.safetrans.com> wrote in message
> news:eooNWKQTFHA.4056@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
(http://www.livevault.com)[vbcol=seagreen]
changes[vbcol=seagreen]
it's[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
experience[vbcol=seagreen]
>